ufnavy06
Some say he has a tattoo of his face on his face.
A bit more on the aerodynamic side.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
NFSBOSS said:This looks good.
The Mustang is not and has never been considered a sportscar. Mustangs, Camaros, Barracudas, Challengers have always been muscle cars.rpm3dinc said:It just doesn't say "Sports Car", more like 2 door sedan. Even the Aston Martin "Sports Car" looks like a sports car, this is more like a 2 door Fusion (new body style). Just my opinion. The 2015 version of a Fox Body Mustang which I think also didn't look like a "Sports Car".
I would get another 2013-2014 Mustang for sure though, cause hopefully the prices will drop on them when these "Euro-Style Stangs" hit the market
orng302 said:The Mustang is not and has never been considered a sportscar. Mustangs, Camaros, Barracudas, Challengers have always been muscle cars.
VTBoss302 said:I prefer the term pony car.
Ford invented the segment.
If it drives like a sports car and barks like a sportscar so it must be a sports car.orng302 said:The Mustang is not and has never been considered a sportscar. Mustangs, Camaros, Barracudas, Challengers have always been muscle cars.
orng302 said:The Mustang is not and has never been considered a sportscar. Mustangs, Camaros, Barracudas, Challengers have always been muscle cars.
Not quite the same as actually stating it is a sportscar. Ponycar completely slipped my mind.Vince said:fwiw, the '65 brochure mentions it has imported sports-car flair
http://oldcarbrochures.org/NA/Ford_-Mustang/1965_Ford_Mustang/1965-Ford-Mustang-Brochure/1965-Ford-Mustang-02-03
F.D. Sako said:I'm tired of seeing renderingswhen are they going to reveal this thing already!