This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I wouldn't say there is a 100% agreed upon consensus, but any time I was in the wind tunnel and we either gave the car rake (lowered front end or raised the rear) or gave the splitter itself rake (lower at the front) the results were a gain in Df, and surprisingly almost no change in drag, or even a small reduction in drag. But these were on cars with a real splitter. I wouldn't consider a PP1 car a real splitter but I'd bet the trend in results would be similar but to a smaller degree.Is there any consensus for ideal chassis rake for non-aero stock S550 PP1 splitter cars? I measure at the lowest point on the rockers.
Hesitant to chime in on aero, but here goes...
I have a 2017 PP1 car that I've been slowly converting to a track car from day 1. Mine is a base GT, and had no rear spoiler of any kind. I decided to wait until I was ready for a wing on the rear to do anything. So, I added an APR GTC200 wing early this year, and have left it set to the 0* position. To balance up front, I made my own splitter out of ABS sheets (to make up for the expensive APR wing!).
I purchased +5mm longer screws to mount directly below the PP1 front lip. I had watched AJ's video about the front spoiler being at 0*, so when I went to measure it, I was surprised to see that it was pointing UP by >2*. I had expected it to be near-level, so surprised to find that. I use a digital level to set to about 1* down (to make up for any error) for track weekends, but since this is putting some force on the splitter, I loosen and let it "rest" between track events.
Same car as I have, except mine's a '16. My car's biggest problem is push (understeer) which IMHO is better than a loose car. It's not horrible push, it's quite manageable. Adding any aero to the rear is going to make that understeer worse so I'm not interested in that. Plus there's the loss of speed on the straights from aero drag, and the track I run most is a very fast track. I like it where it is, very forgiving car to drive with no nasty habits so I'm loathe to start fooling around with aero and potentially upsetting what I think is a very well balanced chassis.
Yeah.. sort of. There will always be a trade off of drag vs cornering ability. As an example, a car that is running less wing, may mph better than a car with more wing.. but, if the car with more wing angle comes off the corner faster, it may get down the straight quicker. Throw in rake, which can unmask the rear wing, but potentially makes the car seem "bigger" to the air traveling over it. We run into this dilemma all the time in Porsche cup, as the cars are basically identical. So we are always farting around with rake and wing angle to try and get the car to set, throw in some funky requirements from Michelin, and you'll know why I'm glad to be returning to GS next year.I agree with your understeer assessment. I think you're right on. Think about where the aero might help you, though. It will only be active in higher speed corners. In first, second and the bottom of third gears, it's influence is small. You'll only really feel it in higher speed corners (4th and 5th gear) and in braking. Chances are good that a little more rear security in these areas will be appreciated. I promise you that whatever drag penalty you pay for downforce will *always* be worth it unless you've massively unbalanced the car. Straightline speed is the least important variable to optimize unless you're on a super-speedway.