Dvendet
Everyone's entitled to my opinion. ;)
As you probably would have expected, in the current June issue of Motor Trend, readers critisized the editor for their test comparison between the 2012 Boss LS and Chevy's ZL1 that was reported in an earlier edition. One letter writer critisized MT for not doing a comparison between a 650 hp Gt500 and the ZL1. MT's lame response (IMHO) was "as we mentioned explicitly in the article, the 2013GT500 was unavailable at the time of the comparison". While this may be true I have 2 questons for the editor of MT regarding this vehicle comparison. 1) Why did MT chose not to wait until the 2013 GT500 was available so they could make a more appropriate apples/apples comparison? and 2) Why didn't MT compare the ZL1 against say a Nissan GTR or the new SRT Viper or Porsche 911 instead?
The apples/orange biased comparison that was made is inexcusable. Even though the Boss was outmatched by 136 supercharged horsepower, the Boss did remarkably well none the less. I have my doubts that MT will ever have the courage to compare the new GT500 with the ZL1. MT has a vested interest in protecting its advertising budget largely conceived in part by donations from Government Motors.
MMD
The apples/orange biased comparison that was made is inexcusable. Even though the Boss was outmatched by 136 supercharged horsepower, the Boss did remarkably well none the less. I have my doubts that MT will ever have the courage to compare the new GT500 with the ZL1. MT has a vested interest in protecting its advertising budget largely conceived in part by donations from Government Motors.
MMD