Looks like quite a few sizes that will work for us. 125 more than 3Rs for 305/19. Curious how they perform and last.
Last edited:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Wow that's crazy. In a 305/30/19 it is 5 lbs lighter than a 3R! Awesome.These tires are looking to be very light weight. A 285/30/18 RE71RS weighs in at 27.8 pounds , which is pretty light for an 18 in that size, but the Hoosier in 295/30/18, a taller and wider tire, comes in at 23.2 pounds. That is a 4.6 pound difference in weight PER TIRE.
for reference a 205/50/15 RT660 will weigh in at 19.6 pounds.
and a 225/45/15 RT660 will weigh in at 22.3 pounds.
These 18" tires are basically the same weight as a 15"
An AO52 in 295/35/18 will weigh in at 27.6 pounds and that is usually seen as the lightweight 200tw
Good info here!These tires are looking to be very light weight. A 285/30/18 RE71RS weighs in at 27.8 pounds , which is pretty light for an 18 in that size, but the Hoosier in 295/30/18, a taller and wider tire, comes in at 23.2 pounds. That is a 4.6 pound difference in weight PER TIRE.
for reference a 205/50/15 RT660 will weigh in at 19.6 pounds.
and a 225/45/15 RT660 will weigh in at 22.3 pounds.
These 18" tires are basically the same weight as a 15"
An AO52 in 295/35/18 will weigh in at 27.6 pounds and that is usually seen as the lightweight 200tw
In regards to Falken, they were testing their compound mid week at streets of willow. I'm not sure what they were testing exactly or how it went. But they were there.All good points and it remains to be seen if they were testing the waters like the Yoke A052s did with their initial run of tires at a similar tread depth. It did not fly with SCCA , so hence we got a reformulation, and there is a possibility Hoosier could do the same especially with so many sizes still in the process of introduction.
I would have to bet NASA will place the tire in with the A052 and RE71RS since they mailed all the members such a resounding email notice, but we will have to see. It is not a 180 TWR tire like the Cup2, so it. might sneak in since the Michelin is well under a 7/32nd standard.
I think we will all agree the determining factor may simply be price because many of us can get a set of RE71RSs at a much lower price and they are almost always included when Bridgerocks has a Sale --- knocking off another 70-100 dollars and more if one has one of their credit cards.
More data out and 2025 looks to be a banner year for " Tire Wars " with the TA Pro, the new Toyo R ( which may get a super favorable factor to run in NASA ), a rumored change in the CR-S V2 ( likely just BS as it was based on why the DOT had issue with the tire ) , and a new RT660 with a redesigned carcass , banding, and tread design. Supposedly the Falken has the same compounding , yet it will be interesting to see new tests with some much else changed.
Choices may also mean we could see some stabilization in pricing and maybe even a lowering or more Sales. It has happened a few times in the past , so let's all hope the intense competition helps us all out.
The tire is supposed to have the same compound, they mentioned that over and over and over, so it probably has changed , ha. The main thing is the interior structure has been done differently as well as the tread pattern. It will be interesting to see how they really shake out!
TeeLew,
As you can tell I agree with you as I sarcastically noted the fact that the Falcon guys noted over and over the compound had not changed that is was likely so that it had. Heck, over the years there was often compound changes throughout the year.