Dave_W
Cones - not just for ice cream
Is it just me or do the pics of cylinder #8 look more reddish than the other pics, especially the valves?
Glad to hear the tuning is working out. Good lock!
Glad to hear the tuning is working out. Good lock!
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Yessir, it does. I asked AI about this (so who knows if it's right or not!) and it said that it's because of the known characteristics about cylinder 8 getting less cooling etc. So it burns off more crud (cyl 8 is also cleaner than the others) but it gets more wear. Dunno if this is right or not, but it seems to make sense...Is it just me or do the pics of cylinder #8 look more reddish than the other pics, especially the valves?
Glad to hear the tuning is working out. Good lock!
I was thinking it was more to seal the engine up, not an actual lubricantLund's take on adding Marvel Mystery oil/2-cycle oil to e85: unnecessary.
One of those things where opinions vary I guess. Shaun is a smart guy and he's usually right. But Lund is my tuner. Ya gotta trust your tuner, right? I think I'll skip it.
I've heard of loose sensors also causing a false senseYou don't have anything like a dropped nut bouncing around the cam galley that the knock sensor is picking up.do you?
That is normal on the Gen1 cars. The fuel pump duty cycle PID is inferred/scaled from the commanded fuel pump operation, so seeing it near the top under WOT does not mean the fuel pump is actually at the top of its flow capacity. Basically the PCM sends the fuel pump control module a command, and the module doubles that command to determine pump output. Ford lists 37% PCM command as normal low speed and 47% as normal high speed
FP duty cycle is inferred on these Like I said and Its not leaning out . If anything its a little rich at WOT due to fuel mixture ( from at least what I last looked at) so you are fine man . The 13-14 Shelby guys say the same thing and its all inferred data so it looks odd to the eye
I wish! Actually -- when I pulled the manifold out last year I found 2 nuts down there. Hoped that was the cause but there was no change from what I could tell.You don't have anything like a dropped nut bouncing around the cam galley that the knock sensor is picking up.do you?
That's a good idea. I'll check next time I'm in thereI've heard of loose sensors also causing a false sense
Roger that! I won't do it"Should I desensitize the knock sensors?" Noooo!!..... please don't. Try to find the false knock, but don't assume its not real! It just takes a little to long to kill the Coyote. Can you show a graph of your knock??
When I had a tune from Lund, they told me to go and drive and forget about looking at the logs.... I melted a hole in my headers about 1.5" wide. After, when I logged the engine for Shaun at AED, he made me find and fix the knock before he would tune anything.

Actually Shaun saw the hole in my header and banned me from his tunes as a potential ass basket.
I wish I knew how to read this . . . rpm on the vertical axis. What is the horizontal axis? What do the brown and blue lines represent and plot on the graph? I see a knock sensor gauge on the left pegged to the far right hand red zone, but I do not know what any of this means.Here's some juicy e85 knock. 3 degrees at 6500 RPM. 1st spike is 1 degree at 5k RPM.
View attachment 112193
My money is still on engine at this point. Piston slap or oil in the cylinders sound like good bets to me. But false knock remains a possibility. This knock shows up on 9/10 of my WOT logs. But every blue moon for no apparent reason I'll get one without knock. There is virtually no knock when not at WOT while driving around. I do get rare spikes but those are likely caused by bumps in the road.
I'm still happy with the e85 mod. Everything just feels smoother.