BLAZN BOSS
http://themustangsource.com/dyno-battle-2013-gt500-vs-2013-camaro-zl1-973/#more-973
5 DOT 0 said:They should be much closer on a road course with the ZL1 using the magical MAG suspension.
Me neither but the suspension on the ZL1 is excellent. Let's face it, it is good enough that Ferrari licenses it from GM. I have no doubt the GT500 will be well behaved but the reviews of the ZL1's on track manners have been impressive. Not that I'd ever buy one of course.PeteInCT said:Remotely and electronically adjustable (which is what the '13 GT500 has I believe) is not the same a dynamic computer controlled mag shocks. The shocks in the ZL1 (as much as I hate to admit it) are constantly adjusting to driving conditions many times a second.
Just to be clear, I'm not a fan of cars that do too much of the driving for you - even if it decreaes lap times. If I was racing for $$$ then I might thing differently.
Too many variables to make a call solely based on redline. From my motorcycle and kart experiences I prefer higher revving engines and would be very happy with a 8,500 redline on our cars. ;Dbatman48195 said:I am a newbie/novice when it comes to performance, but I noticed the Camaro redlines at what looks like 6100 RPM on their Tach and the Shelby redlines at 7000 RPM. I would think it would be better with the Shelby having that room at the top for overall flexibility and performance when racing. Is that correct thinking?
Brian
Justin said:If I was rich I would buy a ZL1 and put a ford engine in it then take it to all the chevy shows just to piss them off lol
5 DOT 0 said:Too many variables to make a call solely based on redline. From my motorcycle and kart experiences I prefer higher revving engines and would be very happy with a 8,500 redline on our cars. ;Dbatman48195 said:I am a newbie/novice when it comes to performance, but I noticed the Camaro redlines at what looks like 6100 RPM on their Tach and the Shelby redlines at 7000 RPM. I would think it would be better with the Shelby having that room at the top for overall flexibility and performance when racing. Is that correct thinking?
Brian
Having recently driven a couple of cars with 8,500 redlines I can imagine it quite vividly. Now if we can add two more cylinders.PeteInCT said:5 DOT 0 said:Too many variables to make a call solely based on redline. From my motorcycle and kart experiences I prefer higher revving engines and would be very happy with a 8,500 redline on our cars. ;Dbatman48195 said:I am a newbie/novice when it comes to performance, but I noticed the Camaro redlines at what looks like 6100 RPM on their Tach and the Shelby redlines at 7000 RPM. I would think it would be better with the Shelby having that room at the top for overall flexibility and performance when racing. Is that correct thinking?
Brian
We have one except for damn PCM programming ! Can you imagine this beast at 8400 ? :
thats so funny that a boss with little bolt ons walked that ZL1. the forum link says invalid when I click on it though5 DOT 0 said:I don't think the GT500 is going to have any trouble with the ZL1 after watching this. Ex cats plus intake and tune this car might have 40 more HP over stock max.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=169JFXbccBs&feature=youtu.be[/youtube]
And for laughs:
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=229931