This is an interesting review because the focus is on the interior.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304447804576413652276836410.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304447804576413652276836410.html
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
jimprw said:I think the article is well written and confirms the Boss to be what it was built to be: a high performance vehicle that equals or betters pretty much anything up to and including an M3 for a fraction of the cost. We must also remember the target price point: between the GT and GT500. The car does all of this and more. If you start adding more costly interior components, then all of a sudden you are pushing very close to the GT500 in price and well beyond what the average person might be willing to drop for a toy. Plus, you increase the weight.
One might argue (and several in this forum have) that FMC should open up the options for the Boss so you can build one with upgraded interior, sound system, glass roof etc. From a marketing standpoint that would make sense. But the car was not built with everyday driving in mind. It was build to honorably carry on the Boss 302 moniker by offering a fairly bare bones Mustang where every cent spent on high-end componentry went into the motor, drivetrain and chassis. The goal of this project was achieved in spades. The 2012 Boss is the ultimate performance Mustang - the best overall pony ever built. And because FMC didn't throw in a bunch of high end interior pieces, I actually can afford to own one - something Henry Ford set out to accomplish in the first place.
I'm thinking with Trackey, the 0-60 acceleration difference may be greater in favor of the Boss. Boss already bests the GT500 by a whopping .1!!!! ;Djimprw said:Some, maybe, but there will still be a price difference and the two cars are different animals and can appeal to different tastes: better balance and handling vs. better brute strength. From what I've seen the difference in actual acceleration is pretty small, and with trackey may get smaller yet. But someone who wants a modern throwback for mainly street use might very well opt for the Shelby -
I wanted a NA car that handles well and is fun to own and drive. I think the Boss will deliver in excess.jimprw said:Some, maybe, but there will still be a price difference and the two cars are different animals and can appeal to different tastes: better balance and handling vs. better brute strength. From what I've seen the difference in actual acceleration is pretty small, and with trackey may get smaller yet. But someone who wants a modern throwback for mainly street use might very well opt for the Shelby -
Yep...I felt exactly the same way...and it does deliver...which you'll finally find out for yourself very soon!5 DOT 0 said:I wanted a NA car that handles well and is fun to own and drive. I think the Boss will deliver in excess.jimprw said:Some, maybe, but there will still be a price difference and the two cars are different animals and can appeal to different tastes: better balance and handling vs. better brute strength. From what I've seen the difference in actual acceleration is pretty small, and with trackey may get smaller yet. But someone who wants a modern throwback for mainly street use might very well opt for the Shelby -
Jeff, welcome to BMO and good luck on your Boss quest.Jeff Quinn said:What bothers me about his writing, and lots of high-brow goober-smoochers do the same thing, is that he twice in that piece begins the second part of a sentence with "not to mention", then immediately mentions that which he stated would not be mentioned. I also write for a living, and have no formal post-secondary education, but this pretty boy has a masters degree in literature.
Now, to the meat of his topic, this new Boss is the only Mustang that has flung a craving upon me since I bought my 1973 Mach 1, and I will, hopefully soon, bring home a new Boss. Up until now, I have always wasted my money on guns and Harleys, but it appears that I will now be laying out about $44,000 plus taxes on a new Ford.
Jeff Quinn
gunblast.com
Jeff Quinn said:What bothers me about his writing, and lots of high-brow goober-smoochers do the same thing, is that he twice in that piece begins the second part of a sentence with "not to mention", then immediately mentions that which he stated would not be mentioned. I also write for a living, and have no formal post-secondary education, but this pretty boy has a masters degree in literature.
Now, to the meat of his topic, this new Boss is the only Mustang that has flung a craving upon me since I bought my 1973 Mach 1, and I will, hopefully soon, bring home a new Boss. Up until now, I have always wasted my money on guns and Harleys, but it appears that I will now be laying out about $44,000 plus taxes on a new Ford.
Jeff Quinn
gunblast.com
Jeff Quinn said:Now, to the meat of his topic, this new Boss is the only Mustang that has flung a craving upon me since I bought my 1973 Mach 1, and I will, hopefully soon, bring home a new Boss. Up until now, I have always wasted my money on guns and Harleys, but it appears that I will now be laying out about $44,000 plus taxes on a new Ford.