- 873
- 0
I like the 2013 gt500 that is a car to own 650hp not to bad for going to get milk and eggs in huh.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Boss3o2 said:Sesshomurai said:Well, the '13's have everything the 12's do plus a lot more. Just look at the list. HID headlights, sync, 4.5" display with track apps. functional heat extractors. prolly some other minor ones. So down the road, I think the '13's will be more wanted. First model years of most cars usually aren't. Nothing against the '12's though. they rock.
That is not typically the case. Don't now where you get your facts from.
1965 Shelby (1st year of the Shelby Mustang) is worth more then 1966, and even later years of the Big Block Shelbys
1969 Boss 429 (1st year of the Boss) is worth more then the 1970 Boss 9's
1969 Boss 302 (1st year of the Boss) pull more money, then the 70 Boss 302's
1969 Mach 1's (first year of the Mach 1), are more desireable and valuable then the 70's and later years of the Mach 1
The facts are that people/enthusiasts/public/future owners etc. will remember the 2012's more. Why? Because the 2012 Boss 302 is the car that set the bench mark for the Ford Mustang (a side from being on the cover of every Automotive Magazine), and were listed as the Best Mustang ever produced (Not the Big HP Shelby's). Every review you see on the 2012 Boss 302 is positive - regardless if you're a Mustang enthusiast. Its just a B*TCHIN machine.
That's why.
Sesshomurai said:Cjmclean31 said:Don't discount the fact that the 12 model was the first, and should Ford decide (hopefully not) to build past 13, there might be multiple year runs that look like the 13.
They won't. Boss is only a 2 year run.
Junk materials?..... not to be rude or anything, but you have no idea what you're talking about. Cars back then were pretty well built, but today's cars are even better. If you want "junk materials" look at the 2006-current Honda Civic. But, don't talk down the 2010-current Mustang, as it has probably the best quality materials in its class. Let's all face the fact, Mustang gives you bang for your buck, it's not supposed to be a luxury car.jeepinocala said:Well this is 2012 and I will be surprised if any of these last very long with the junk materials they use lets all face it they are not built like they were back in the day.
Ok first let me tell you I own a 2012 boss but I will be the first to admit yes the materials of today are crap look I am a medical prototype senior programmer/tool maker and I know materials so sorry to upset you but the metal used today is stretched so far compared to the older cars just take yours out and get into an accident with an older one and you will know what I mean. Dont get me wrong I love all Fords just dont fool yourself today the going thing is how can we make it cheaper to survive thats just it plain and simple back in the day it was how good can we build it. Materials is my living I also own a small prototype cnc machine shop so no your not going to win the metal issue with me. Maybe when I say junk it freaks you out but comparing to back in the day it is. Corner cutting is how they make money think about it if they were to spend the money on expensive materials these things would cost triple.LikeABoss said:Junk materials?..... not to be rude or anything, but you have no idea what you're talking about. Cars back then were pretty well built, but today's cars are even better. If you want "junk materials" look at the 2006-current Honda Civic. But, don't talk down the 2010-current Mustang, as it has probably the best quality materials in its class. Let's all face the fact, Mustang gives you bang for your buck, it's not supposed to be a luxury car.jeepinocala said:Well this is 2012 and I will be surprised if any of these last very long with the junk materials they use lets all face it they are not built like they were back in the day.
302BOB said:Today's cars have to focus on being as light as they can be to be more fuel efficient, especially with new government mandates having to be met. Cars of the past were "tanks" because gas mileage wasn't a priority back then ( gas was 15 cents a gallon). Today every ounce counts. I don't know how true it was, But when I bought my Boss the salesman said leather seats weren't available to save weight. Bottom line, Cars will never be made like they were years ago ( I miss my chrome bumpers)...maybe that's a good thing.
302BOB said:Today's cars have to focus on being as light as they can be to be more fuel efficient, especially with new government mandates having to be met. Cars of the past were "tanks" because gas mileage wasn't a priority back then ( gas was 15 cents a gallon). Today every ounce counts. I don't know how true it was, But when I bought my Boss the salesman said leather seats weren't available to save weight. Bottom line, Cars will never be made like they were years ago ( I miss my chrome bumpers)...maybe that's a good thing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aDs1sHJLFE This, to prove my point...jeepinocala said:Ok first let me tell you I own a 2012 boss but I will be the first to admit yes the materials of today are crap look I am a medical prototype senior programmer/tool maker and I know materials so sorry to upset you but the metal used today is stretched so far compared to the older cars just take yours out and get into an accident with an older one and you will know what I mean. Dont get me wrong I love all Fords just dont fool yourself today the going thing is how can we make it cheaper to survive thats just it plain and simple back in the day it was how good can we build it. Materials is my living I also own a small prototype cnc machine shop so no your not going to win the metal issue with me. Maybe when I say junk it freaks you out but comparing to back in the day it is. Corner cutting is how they make money think about it if they were to spend the money on expensive materials these things would cost triple.LikeABoss said:Junk materials?..... not to be rude or anything, but you have no idea what you're talking about. Cars back then were pretty well built, but today's cars are even better. If you want "junk materials" look at the 2006-current Honda Civic. But, don't talk down the 2010-current Mustang, as it has probably the best quality materials in its class. Let's all face the fact, Mustang gives you bang for your buck, it's not supposed to be a luxury car.jeepinocala said:Well this is 2012 and I will be surprised if any of these last very long with the junk materials they use lets all face it they are not built like they were back in the day.