The Mustang Forum for Track & Racing Enthusiasts

Taking your Mustang to an open track/HPDE event for the first time? Do you race competitively? This forum is for you! Log in to remove most ads.

  • Welcome to the Ford Mustang forum built for owners of the Mustang GT350, BOSS 302, GT500, and all other S550, S197, SN95, Fox Body and older Mustangs set up for open track days, road racing, and/or autocross. Join our forum, interact with others, share your build, and help us strengthen this community!

Where's Wally

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Black Boss said:
Rear Camber was 1.2* from the factory, very close to the R Track spec of 1.25* so I didn't change it. Spec for 350 is 1.00*

Rear tire wear looked even, but we'll see what happens when pushing harder. Of all the alignment settings, rear camber is the most difficult to adjust -- the bolts are well buried.

Also my Rear Toe was 3/32" In. Both the 350 and R Track specs are 0.30" (11/32") which seems really high -- I didn't alter mine, and didn't experience any instability under braking. Anyone @ArizonaBOSS @VoodooBOSS @fuhrius @Moto @voodoo child21 have any insight on rear toe -- this new fangled IRS is new to me ;D

In general, for an IRS car, the "fast" setup is a little toe-out in the front suspension, a little toe-in in the rear. Toe out in the rear is not good.
 
VoodooBOSS said:
I think the difference in the factory recommended camber settings is more tire than suspension dependant. Regardless they aren't going to be relevant for many of you. ;)

Agree, tires will be the biggest variable, and we are only at the start of the learning curve....

ArizonaBOSS said:
In general, for IRS, the "fast" setup is a little toe-out in the front, a little toe-in in the rear. Toe out in the rear is not good.

Thanks -- makes sense.

8250RPM said:
Rear toe would be best at 0-.062 according to Vorshlag on a IRS

Now that makes sense -- I'd mis-read the spec it's 0.3* in not 0.3in
 
ArizonaBOSS said:
In general, for an IRS car, the "fast" setup is a little toe-out in the front suspension, a little toe-in in the rear. Toe out in the rear is not good.

it's interesting that the front toe settings are quite different. the gt350 has toe out of .1 degree and the r has toe in of .06 degree.
 
fuhrius said:
it's interesting that the front toe settings are quite different. the gt350 has toe out of .1 degree and the r has toe in of .06 degree.

That actually makes a lot of sense, Althought it's the same car it's an apples to to green apples situation. damn, I need my GT 350 :-[
 
fuhrius said:
it's interesting that the front toe settings are quite different. the gt350 has toe out of .1 degree and the r has toe in of .06 degree.
A good majority of these cars will be on aftermarket track wheels with R compound tires on the track so the Ford alignment specs for the OEM Michelins go out the window to a degree. I would bet the most popular choice will be R7s for both GT350 & GT350R owners meaning the alignment specs will be similar. Realistically how much difference is there between .06 and .1 degrees of toe anyway? I have generally run zero toe on the front since I still drive mine on the street to preserve the street tires.
 
Nick did you add TPMS to your second set of wheels? If so what frequency are the sensors. I see 433 and 313 Mhz sensors available from RoushYates as take offs. Also what stems did you use, the DILL-VS-925B?
 
VoodooBOSS said:
8) Did Track Day Solutions make those for you? Also which lug nuts did you use with your Forgestar wheels? I'm looking at these due to the recessed nature of the GT350 front wheels.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00SF8FA7C/ref=ox_sc_sfl_title_3?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A2F8QH83YSA2LG

81e84UT%2BTOL._SL1500_.jpg

I used these Titanium 12 point lug nuts. 3.5 oz for titanium. 12.5 oz for the stock
2a841bf957d3ed1093c7dcfa74c5d061.jpg
c377de04ab2f5a323a6bc03e3a4d4607.jpg
ca8337637bc4a8032a81bbce24ad9c2d.jpg
 

Latest posts

Buy TMO Apparel

Buy TMO Apparel
Top